Here is a question that I've been asking myself lately, should I equery agents or snail mail them?
Technology is a good thing, but I wonder if the idea that you can sit down and dash off numerous equeries in one sitting can be a bad thing for the serious writer.
Let me explain:
Everybody and his brother thinks he can write. Just like every wannabe on American Idol thinks he can sing, but when he is told by pros that he doesn't have a hope in hell of making it in the biz, he still listens to mom, dad, bro, sis and Great-Aunt Gertie who think he's the next big thang.
Well, you ain't, brother. Listen to the pros and don't give up your day job. Sound familiar?
Think about this if you will. If every yahoo wannabe writer out there in cyberspace equeries every agent who accepts equeries that would increase the amount of queries in an agents inbox by at least a ten-fold, probably more.
Agents already have a job. It's to work for the writers signed in their stable. So if an agent has a busy week those queries pile up in the inbox, AND if said agent doesn't have an auto-reply letting wannabe author know the equery was rec'd, he gets hit again and again. Methinks there is a lot of deleting going on just to clean out the mailbox. And the serious writer gets dumped just as quickly as the yahoo who doesn't have a finished manuscript, or doesn't know how to write, or asks if the 'idea' is good enough to write about, or doesn't have a clue about the genre he's writing in.
As much as I hate the idea of going old school and giving USPS my money, I DO want to give my Leprechaun story a chance. I've exhausted all the agents who accept equeries (I finally got tired of looking at my rejections folder and deleted it all--without documenting who I happened to query--OOPS!), but there are a slew of agents representing fantasy that don't accept equeries I haven't queried via USPS yet.
True, it might be time for me to shove this story under the bed, but I'm not ready to do that yet. I'm giving it another try and will query the last few agents on the list. What will it hurt? Yeah, I could get rejected, but I'm used to that. Who knows? I might actually find my 'dream agent'.
What do you all think? Shove the book under the bed or give it another shot by going old school?
Write on!
I love the ease of equeries, and most agents have switched to cyber queries. But when I sent out my last book, I sent out snail mail too. If the agent is great, I'm not letting a 42 cent stamp stop me.
ReplyDeleteI don't think a good email query would be deleted as quickly as one by a newbie who writes a silly one. A good query might be deleted or rejected because it's not what the agent is looking for, but that would happen with a snail mail query too.
Good luck with your queries!
I'd send it out, Margaret. I think it's definately worth a shot!
ReplyDeleteAshlynn
I think you might be right about some mass-dumpings on equeries. I've heard grumbles about it.
ReplyDeleteYou can always shove the ms under the bed later, but give it a shot the old-fashioned way first.